Pages
Popular Articles
- Defining Project Boundaries
- 5 Things You Should Know About IT People
- 3 Reasons a Competitive CMS Market is Good
- Building a Website is Like Building a House
- How Website Hosting Works
- Print Designers: Welcome to the Web
Links
Archives
- July 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- May 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
The Problem with Google Chrome
October 22nd, 2008 | by Brett DerricottBy now you may have heard that Google has released its own web browser called “Chrome.” While more competition in a market is usually a good thing for consumers, Google’s decision to put another browser in the mix doesn’t sit well with a lot of web developers.
Although Chrome is built from the WebKit rendering engine that also powers Safari, it’s still another browser that developers will have to cater to. So, each additional browser that a developer has to target increases the total cost of development.
Why, you ask? It’s because each browser vendor takes some liberties when they interpret the standards that dictate how HTML and CSS are rendered. Getting code to look the same in all browsers ends up being quite a chore, with special tricks needed to workaround individual issues in each browser. So, each version of each browser can vary in how it interprets and displays code, making a developer’s job pretty difficult. That difficulty ends up translating into higher costs for you and your clients.
Another problem with Google Chrome is that it competes head-to-head with Mozilla’s Firefox browser. Firefox has been gaining momentum in its quest to unseat Internet Explorer as the dominant browser on the Web and most of us have been cheering Firefox on. Chrome is likely to gain most of its market share from existing Firefox users, at least initially, effectively cannibalizing the effort to overtake IE. Some may argue, however, that Chrome has a better shot at accomplishing this than Firefox and should, therefore, take over the lead in this fight. The jury is still out on that one.
Finally, Google’s motive isn’t really to make a better browser, just like creating Gmail wasn’t about making email better. Google wants access to all of our information and to everything that we do online. The more they know about us, the more targeted their advertising can be. Having targeted advertising isn’t inherently a bad thing; in fact if I have to see advertising I prefer that it’s at least relevant to me. The issue is (and it’s a bit conspiracy-theory, I admit) that Google has their hands in too much of our information already.
Thanks to Google, a single system now has the ability to see everywhere we go online (Google Chrome), everything we search for (Google Search), all emails we send and receive (Gmail), the documents we create (Google Docs), conversations with our friends (Google Chat/Talk), the news and information we subscribe to (Google Reader), and even what’s on our computers (Google Desktop).
If a person uses every service offered by Google, nearly every touchpoint to the Internet is via Google. It wasn’t that long ago that we were all complaining about the stranglehold Microsoft had on the industry. Are we sure it’s a good idea to let Google become the next Microsoft?
What are you thoughts about Google Chrome? Post a comment below. I’m positive not everyone will agree with my viewpoint on this subject!
Comments
@David: Great point. The Android mobile operating system gives Google great control over mobile phones and Grand Central gives them an in with landline phones. We should probably mention Google Calendar, Maps, Earth, and the rest of the product line too!
They will also control my next trip to the moon.
Echo the two previously posted comments on the mobile phone industry. Yes, it appears that Google has world domination in it’s sights
Anyone seen the movie Eagle Eye?!
You could also add Android/G1 phone to the mix as well. With Google’s purchase of Grand Central, it makes you wonder if they won’t start picking keywords out of our phone conversations. True, that could be a bit conspiracy theory as well, but it’s the same principle they’re already using with our written communication, so why not? Good post!