Agency Byte - an Agency Fusion Blog

Interactive Agencies

March 20th, 2008 | by Brett

I just read an interesting article on the Advertising Age website. The author, Phil Johnson, talks about the trend toward agencies wanting to incorporate more interactive capabilities and provides some insights from his own efforts.

Phil talks a bit about his own frustrations with trying to increase his agency’s interactive offering. The following observation is worth reading.

One deliberate step I took was to discover what truly separated interactive agencies from ad agencies that were pitching interactive capabilities. I’m simplifying, but I found three qualities in the interactive agencies that were missing in traditional agencies.

  1. The truly interactive shops had senior technology leadership that was shaping agency direction and client engagements. That’s a big difference than having a wicked smart programmer who’s dancing to the tune of the creative department.
  2. They worshipped information architecture. The interactive agencies had a deep respect for a discipline to which ad agencies, at best, play lip service.
  3. The agencies that got it didn’t try to push interactive engagements through a process developed 100 years ago for advertising. If you’re an ad agency, you will need to break some bones to reset them correctly. We should be walking again soon.

Because of my experience working for agencies in a technical role via Agency Fusion, I can tell you that most agencies we work with haven’t quite figured out the three things quoted above.

Most agencies aren’t lead by people who understand the interactive world at all. Most agencies don’t seem to know what information architecture is and the fact that it’s every bit as important as design. Most agencies try to shoe-horn interactive into the same processes they use for print and everything else.

We do work with a few agencies who either truly get the interactive world or, if they don’t, they trust us enough to let us help them succeed on interactive projects. I’d love to see the rest of our clients move away from hiring us to be “a wicked smart programmer who’s dancing to the tune of the creative department.”

If you’re trying to build a stronger interactive offering at your agency, read Phil’s article and spend some serious time pondering his three observations. If you have questions or comments, please post them or feel free to contact my company for help.

Comments

Paul / March 22, 2008, 7:58 pm

The EXACT frustration I had while working for an ad agency. And the reason I will never work for another ad agency again that does not get it.
It’s hard to feel good about selling your services to a client when you know it’s not the best way to do it, just the best way to sell them what the agency wants. Which is typically not at all what the client needs.

Brett Derricott / March 24, 2008, 8:23 am

Thanks for the comment, Paul. With the great work that you do I can see how it would be frustrating to sell anything but what you know the client really needs!

JP Holecka / March 26, 2008, 11:44 pm

I hear it all the time. We do work directly with clients and work for traditional ad agency’s that contract us to do the “digital” component of the campaign. They quite often hand us boards for some under thought banner campaign with no thought to where the campaign goes from there. They never think beyond the click as it is not sexy nore can they enter it into the annual award show.

Until the digital generation begin to head up these agency’s they will continue to flounder.

I can’t wait for the day that I will no longer have to hear “Can’t we just do a lift of the tv spot? We already have it in the can and it tests well.”