<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rant: Is it Cingular or AT&amp;T?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.agencyfusion.com/blog/2007/01/09/rant-which-is-it-cingular-or-att/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.agencyfusion.com/blog/2007/01/09/rant-which-is-it-cingular-or-att/</link>
	<description>Technology for creatives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 14:34:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.agencyfusion.com/blog/2007/01/09/rant-which-is-it-cingular-or-att/comment-page-1/#comment-1274</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 19:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.agencybyte.com/2007/01/09/rant-which-is-it-cingular-or-att/#comment-1274</guid>
		<description>The reason for your confusion is simple.   AT&amp;T had nothing to do with AT&amp;T Wireless. 

AT&amp;T Wireless was at one time part of AT&amp;T(T). But in 2000 it spun off as it&#039;s own entity, AT&amp;T Wireless (AWE). It paid licensing fees to AT&amp;T to use the name &quot;AT&amp;T&quot;, but was a seperate company, with very little in common.

AT&amp;T Wireless(AWE) ran itself into the ground by 2004, due to gross mis-management, and had to sell to Cingular. 

Then in 2005, the old parent company AT&amp;T(T), merges with SBC (Southwest Bell) the managing partner of Cingular. It, AT&amp;T,decides it needs to offer wireless as part of its &quot;Triple Play&quot; of service packages (phone, DSL, wireless), so now is changing the name of Cingular to AT&amp;T.

It&#039;s simple, well not really, it&#039;s quite incestuous.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason for your confusion is simple.   AT&amp;T had nothing to do with AT&amp;T Wireless. </p>
<p>AT&amp;T Wireless was at one time part of AT&amp;T(T). But in 2000 it spun off as it&#8217;s own entity, AT&amp;T Wireless (AWE). It paid licensing fees to AT&amp;T to use the name &#8220;AT&amp;T&#8221;, but was a seperate company, with very little in common.</p>
<p>AT&amp;T Wireless(AWE) ran itself into the ground by 2004, due to gross mis-management, and had to sell to Cingular. </p>
<p>Then in 2005, the old parent company AT&amp;T(T), merges with SBC (Southwest Bell) the managing partner of Cingular. It, AT&amp;T,decides it needs to offer wireless as part of its &#8220;Triple Play&#8221; of service packages (phone, DSL, wireless), so now is changing the name of Cingular to AT&amp;T.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s simple, well not really, it&#8217;s quite incestuous&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Derricott</title>
		<link>http://www.agencyfusion.com/blog/2007/01/09/rant-which-is-it-cingular-or-att/comment-page-1/#comment-904</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Derricott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 21:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.agencybyte.com/2007/01/09/rant-which-is-it-cingular-or-att/#comment-904</guid>
		<description>@Steven: Glad to hear things have improved since I left AT&amp;T.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Steven: Glad to hear things have improved since I left AT&#038;T.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steven</title>
		<link>http://www.agencyfusion.com/blog/2007/01/09/rant-which-is-it-cingular-or-att/comment-page-1/#comment-766</link>
		<dc:creator>steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.agencybyte.com/2007/01/09/rant-which-is-it-cingular-or-att/#comment-766</guid>
		<description>I have been a cingular customer for eight years or so, first in Connecticut (NYCburb), then moved in utah last year. Cingular was wierd here the first three months after they bought AT&amp;T, but kicked into gear fast.I always liked cingular best and still do. Many friends had Verizon in the east Cingualr was simply better. I travel for rural photography in the west, and they all have serious work to do if you get off the interstate!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been a cingular customer for eight years or so, first in Connecticut (NYCburb), then moved in utah last year. Cingular was wierd here the first three months after they bought AT&amp;T, but kicked into gear fast.I always liked cingular best and still do. Many friends had Verizon in the east Cingualr was simply better. I travel for rural photography in the west, and they all have serious work to do if you get off the interstate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
